Poor Performance

LRA provides strong protection for sick, disabled

Ivan Israelstam

The law prohibits employers from disciplining employees who are ill or disabled

 For example, an employee who uses narcotics and becomes addicted is legally classified as being ill and is protected by law. Section 6 of the Employment Equity Act prohibits unfair discrimination against employees on the grounds of disability or illness.

This means that an employer may not discriminate against an employee merely due to the fact that the employee is disabled. In fact the same Act obliges employers to find ways of recruiting and seeking ways to accommodate people with disabilities.

Furthermore, section 187(1)(f) of the Labour Relations Act (LRA) says that: "A dismissal is automatically unfair if the reason for the dismissal is that the employer unfairly discriminated against an employee, directly or indirectly, on any arbitrary ground, including, but not limited to race, gender, sex, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, political opinion, culture, language, marital status or family responsibility."

The fact that disability is included in the above list means, for example, that if your receptionist loses an arm in an accident (whether work-related or not) you cannot terminate his/her employment because you believe that a disabled receptionist looks bad to customers who come to visit.

You would have to prove that this receptionist is in fact unable to work before you could even consider terminating his/her employment. In the case of Black Mountain v CCMA and others (2005 1 BLLR 0001) the employee was found guilty of causing damage to the employer's property while driving under the influence of alcohol.

The employee was dismissed and referred an unfair dismissal dispute to the CCMA as he believed he should have been sent for alcoholic rehabilitation instead of being fired. The CCMA arbitrator agreed and overturned the dismissal. The employer applied to the Labour Court for the arbitrator's decision to be reviewed.

However, the Labour Court, after looking at the employer's policy in regard to alcohol-related infringements, decided that:

  • The employee had been wrong in what he had done.
  • The employer should have allowed the employee to go for rehabilitation.
  • The dismissal was unfair
  • The employer was required to reinstate the employee and to give him back-pay for a period of 18 months.
  • The employer was to pay this money to the employee with interest.

In the case of Mthethwa v Capitol Caterers (2007, 5 BALR 469) the employee was dismissed after he was off ill from work for two weeks. The CCMA ordered the employer to reinstate him with full back-pay, because the employer had failed to follow the incapacity laws.

The above cases make it clear that, although employees can be dismissed for abusing sick leave, absence without permission and poor work performance:

  • Sick employees are strongly protected from unfair treatment aimed at their disabilities.
  • Alcohol abuse can be seen as an illness in South African law.
  • Employers are legally required to adhere to their own policies.
  • Treatment must be considered before dismissal of a sick employee can be considered.
  • The incapacity procedure prescribed by law cannot be ignored.

Therefore all employers are advised to:

  • Check with a labour law expert as to whether or not the circumstances merit dismissal.
  • Explore every alternative to dismissal before considering terminating the employment of a sick employee.
  • Genuinely and thoroughly involve the incapacitated employee in the process of consideration of alternatives, giving the employee ample opportunity to state his/her case.
  • Formally place on record every step taken in the above process.
  • Ensure that the entire process is planned and managed by an expert in labour law and industrial relations.

Ivan Israelstam is chief executive of Labour Law Management Consulting. He can be contacted on 011-888-7944 or

Our appreciation to Ivan and The Star newspaper for permission to publish this article

Case Law Summaries and Articles

 

Can employees be dismissed for refusing to accept new terms and conditions of employment?

Can an employer dismiss employees because they refuse to agree to a change to their terms and conditions of employment? An initial answer may be, “yes”.

Read More >>>

 

Escape route: “Resignation with immediate effect”

The latest case in the ‘disciplining employees who have resigned with immediate effect’ saga has brought about more uncertainty as to whether an employee who resigns with immediate effect shortly before a disciplinary hearing can avoid disciplinary action and subsequent dismissal.

Read More >>>

 

Freedom of expression or incitement to commit an offence? A constitutional challenge

On 4 July 2019, the North Gauteng High Court handed down judgment in the case of The EFF and other v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and other (87638/2017 and 45666/2017) in which the EFF and Julius Malema (the applicants) sought to have s18(2)(b) of the Riotous Assemblies Act, No 17 of 1956 (Riotous Act) declared unconstitutional.

Read More >>>

 

Consolidated, comprehensive or general final written warnings

Regarding dismissal, according to the Code of Good Practice, “the courts have endorsed the concept of corrective or progressive discipline. This approach regards the purpose of discipline as a means for employees to know and understand what standards are required of them.

Read More >>>

 

 

 

 

 

 

Courses and Workshops

 

                                         

 
 

Employment Equity Committee Training

23 August 2019 (Fully Booked)

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

29 August 2019 (Fully Booked)

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Cape Town

30 August 2019

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Cape Town

27 September 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

04 October 2019

Southern Sun: Maharani: Durban

Shop Steward Training

28 August 2019

Emperors Palace Convention Centre

Basic Labour Relations

04 September 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Course

12 September 2019

Southern Sun: Maharani Towers: Durban

The OHS Act and the Responsibilities of Management

13 September 2019

Southern Sun: Maharani Towers: Durban

19 September 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

28 November 2019

Protea Hotel By Marriott Tyger Valley: Cape Town

Managing Day to Day Issues/ Problem Employees Full day workshop

20 September 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

27 September 2019

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Cape Town

AARTO and the Impact on Your Business

03 October 2019

Emperors Palace Convention Centre

Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment Course

18 October 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

21 November 2019

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Stay Easy: Cape Town

Workshop Incident/Accident Investigation Course

25 October 2019

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

22 November 2019

Tsogo Sun: Century City: Stay Easy: Cape Town

  

 Our Clients